Some of these resources are made available through our library database, and will require you to login to MARQNET ID to get to the full text.

Giving Feedback

  1. Al-Hattami, Abdulghani Ali. 2019. 鈥淭he Perception of Students and Faculty Staff on the Role of Constructive Feedback.鈥 International Journal of Instruction 12 (1): 885鈥94.
  2. Leibold, Nancyruth, and Laura Marie Schwarz. 鈥淭he Art of Giving Online Feedback.鈥 Journal of Effective Teaching 15, no. 1 (January 1, 2015): 34鈥46.
  3. Isnawati, Ida, Gunadi Harry Sulistyo, Utami Widiati, and Nunung Suryati. 2019. International Journal of Instruction 12 (1): 669鈥84.

Peer Assessment

  1. Handayani, Rif鈥檃ti Dina, Marlina Ummas Genisa, and Triyanto. 鈥淓mpowering Physics Students鈥 Performance in a Group Discussion through Two Types of Peer Assessment.鈥 International Journal of Instruction 12, no. 1 (January 1, 2019): 655鈥68.

Rubrics

  1. Chowdhury, Faieza. 2019. 鈥淎pplication of Rubrics in the Classroom: A Vital Tool for Improvement in Assessment, Feedback and Learning.鈥 International Education Studies 12 (1): 61鈥68. 

Assessment 

  1. Rawlusyk, P. E. 2018. 鈥淎ssessment in Higher Education and Student Learning.鈥 Journal of Instructional Pedagogies 21 (October).

Instructional Design 

  1. Cachero-Gonzalez, Maria Luz, Antonio Medina-Rivilla, Maria Concepcion Dominguez-Garrido, and Maria Medina-Dominguez. 2019. 鈥淭he Learning Platform in Distance Higher Education: Students鈥 Perceptions.鈥 Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education 20 (1): 71鈥95.
  2. Kibaru, Francis. 鈥淪upporting Faculty to Face Challenges in Design and Delivery of Quality Courses in Virtual Learning Environments.鈥 Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education 19, no. 4 (October 1, 2018): 176鈥97.
  3. Hultberg, Patrik, David Santandreu Calonge, and Eugene Lee. 2018. 鈥淧romoting Long-Lasting Learning through Instructional Design.鈥 Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning 18 (3): 26鈥43.
  4. Jan, Shazia K., and Panos Vlachopoulos. 2018. 鈥淚nfluence of Learning Design of the Formation of Online Communities of Learning.鈥 International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning 19 (4): 1鈥16.

Accessibility 

  1. Al-Azawei, Ahmed, et al. 鈥淯niversal Design for Learning (UDL): A Content Analysis of Peer-Reviewed Journal Papers from 2012 to 2015.鈥 Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, vol. 16, no. 3, June 2016, pp. 39鈥56. EBSCOhost, search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eric&AN=EJ1104867&site=eds-live.
  2. Rice, Mary F. 鈥淪upporting Literacy with Accessibility: Virtual School Course Designers鈥 Planning for Students with Disabilities.鈥 Online Learning 22, no. 4 (December 1, 2018): 161鈥79.

Adult Learning Theory 

  1. Cox, Elaine. 鈥淐oaching and Adult Learning: Theory and Practice.鈥 New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, no. 148, Jan. 2015, pp. 27鈥38.
  2. Gilstrap, Donald L. 鈥淲hy Do We Teach? Adult Learning Theory in Professional Standards as a Basis for Curriculum Development.鈥 College & Research Libraries, vol. 74, no. 5, Sept. 2013, pp. 501鈥518.
  3. Kenner, Cari, and Jason Weinerman. 鈥淎dult Learning Theory: Applications to Non-Traditional College Students.鈥 Journal of College Reading and Learning, vol. 41, no. 2, Jan. 2011, pp. 87鈥96. 
  4. Yarbrough, Jillian Ruth. 2018. 鈥淎dapting Adult Learning Theory to Support Innovative, Advanced, Online Learning -- WVMD Model.鈥 Research in Higher Education Journal 35 (October). 

Blended Learning 

  1. BHOWMIK, Jahar, et al. 鈥淯sing Blended Learning in Postgraduate Applied Statistics Programs.鈥 Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education (TOJDE), vol. 20, no. 2, Apr. 2019, pp. 64鈥77. EBSCOhost
  2. Cundell, Alicia, and Emily Sheepy. 2018. 鈥淪tudent Perceptions of the Most Effective and Engaging Online Learning Activities in a Blended Graduate Seminar.鈥 Online Learning 22 (3): 87鈥102.
  3. Harahap, Fauziyah, et al. 鈥淭he Effect of Blended Learning on Student鈥檚 Learning Achievement and Science Process Skills in Plant Tissue Culture Course.鈥 International Journal of Instruction, vol. 12, no. 1, Jan. 2019, pp. 521鈥538. 

Underrepresented Communities 

  1. Athens, Wendy. 2018. 鈥淧erceptions of the Persistent: Engagement and Learning Community in Underrepresented Populations.鈥 Online Learning 22 (2): 27鈥57.
  2. Engle, Jennifer, et al. 鈥淭op Gainers: Some Public Four-Year Colleges and Universities Make Big Improvements in Minority Graduation Rates. College Results Online.鈥 Education Trust, Education Trust, 1 Jan. 2010.
  3. Gavassa, Sat, et al. 鈥淐losing the Achievement Gap in a Large Introductory Course by Balancing Reduced In-Person Contact with Increased Course Structure.鈥 CBE - Life Sciences Education, vol. 18, no. 1, Mar. 2019.
  4. Kaupp, Ray. 鈥淥nline Penalty: The Impact of Online Instruction on the Latino-White Achievement Gap.鈥 Journal of Applied Research in the Community College, vol. 19, no. 2, Jan. 2012, pp. 8鈥16. 
  5. Wladis, Claire, et al. 鈥淭he Representation of Minority, Female, and Non-Traditional Stem Majors in the Online Environment at Community Colleges: A Nationally Representative Study.鈥 Community College Review, vol. 43, no. 1, Jan. 2015, pp. 89鈥114.

Effectiveness of Asynchronous Online Learning 

  1. Chauhan, Vijendra, et al. 鈥淎synchronous versus Traditional Teaching for MBBS Undergraduate Students-Effectiveness and Students Perspectives - A Pilot Study.鈥 International Journal of Applied & Basic Medical Research, vol. 9, no. 2, Apr. 2019, pp. 69鈥72.
  2. Chohan, Bushra Iqbal. 鈥淪tudents鈥 Perceptions Regarding Teaching Effectiveness in Online Learning and Traditional Face to Face Learning Environment.鈥 FWU Journal of Social Sciences, vol. 8, no. 1, Summer 2014, pp. 50鈥56.
  3. Manning-Ouellette, Amber, and Katie M. Black. 鈥淟earning Leadership: A Qualitative Study on the Differences of Student Learning in Online versus Traditional Courses in a Leadership Studies Program.鈥 Journal of Leadership Education, vol. 16, no. 2, Apr. 2017, pp. 59鈥79. 
  4. Means, Barbara, et al. 鈥淭he Effectiveness of Online and Blended Learning: A Meta-Analysis of the Empirical Literature.鈥 Teachers College Record, vol. 115, no. 3, Jan. 2013.
  5. Nguyen, Tuan. 鈥淭he Effectiveness of Online Learning: Beyond No Significant Difference and Future Horizons.鈥 Journal of Online Learning & Teaching, vol. 11, no. 2, June 2015, pp. 309鈥319.